Development of a screening tool for reading readiness and early literacy skills in elementary students: mapping reading challenges and support practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62385/literal.v3i02.224Keywords:
early literacy, reading readiness, reading difficulties, kesiapan membaca, screening toolsAbstract
Early reading readiness plays a critical role in children’s academic development, yet many students in Indonesia continue to face challenges in acquiring foundational literacy skills. This study aims to map early reading readiness and reading difficulties among children in preschool to Grade 2 in the Thousand Islands, representing the initial stage of developing a contextually appropriate early literacy screening tool. A total of 309 parents and 48 teachers participated using purposive sampling. Data were collected through parent and teacher questionnaires, whose reliability values improved after item refinement (parents: 0.496 → 0.605; teachers: 0.395 → 0.619). Quantitative results revealed several key findings: 76.7% of households lacked dedicated reading spaces, 51.4% of children were not yet reading independently, and 68.7% of Grade 1 students entered school unable to read. Teachers reported high proportions of decoding (72.9%) and comprehension difficulties (58.3%), with comprehension problems being the most frequently identified (total 196 cases). These findings align with the Simple View of Reading and Scarborough’s Reading Rope, indicating that weaknesses in phonemic awareness, decoding, and language comprehension form the core of early reading challenges in this region. The study’s implications highlight the urgent need for an early literacy screening tool that integrates environmental factors, instructional variability, and children’s foundational skills. Such a tool can support early identification and targeted intervention, particularly in geographically unique regions like the Thousand Islands. However, the study is limited by its regional specificity, use of self-report data, and the exploratory nature of the instruments. Future research should expand to multiple regions, incorporate direct child assessments, and involve external expert validation to strengthen the tool development process.
Downloads
References
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Foy, P., & Mann, V. (2015). Progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2016 assessment framework. IEA.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remediation and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Gove, A., & Wetterberg, A. (2017). Reading for all: The importance of early grade reading interventions in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.002
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Inyega, H. (2007). An integrative review of teaching reading in Kenyan primary schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.6
Justus, O., & Inyega, H. N. (2017). Mainstreaming early grade reading instruction in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 45–53.
Murnane, R., & Ganimian, A. J. (2018). Improving early-grade literacy in developing countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(4), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22118
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. C. (2006). The knowledge gap: Implications of leveling the playing field for low-income children. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.2.3
Nurjanah, N. (2020). Early literacy development in urban primary schools: Challenges and strategies. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 45–58.
Piper, B., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2017). Evidence-based early grade reading interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 1073–1106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317710121
PIRLS. (2016). Progress in international reading literacy study: Results for Indonesian students. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
PIRLS. (2021). Progress in international reading literacy study: Global report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
PISA. (2018). Programme for international student assessment: Results for Indonesia. OECD.
Rahmawati, S. (2021). Reading difficulties among early grade students in Jakarta: Teacher perspectives. Journal of Literacy Studies in Education, 8(2), 112–129.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
Septianti, N., & Afiani, R. (2020). Pentingnya memahami karakteristik siswa sekolah dasar di SDN Cikokol 2. AS-SABIQUN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v2i1.611
Tocci, C. M., & Meadows, J. (2019). Home literacy environment and early reading achievement: A systematic review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1593437
Utchell, L. A., Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., & McG, K. E. (2016). Ability of early literacy measures to predict future state assessment performance. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Deden Mulyadi, Adi Adinugroho , Patricia Lestari Taslim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
