Evaluating the impact of virtual reality on student learning outcomes in higher education: A mixed-methods study from Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62385/jepams.v3i1.237Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Educational innovation, Higher education, Immersive technologies, Virtual RealityAbstract
Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR and AR) technologies are increasingly recognized as transformative tools in education, offering immersive learning experiences that enhance engagement and understanding. This study explored the impact of VR and AR on higher education at Zambia University College of Technology (ZUT), guided by Constructivist Learning Theory, which emphasizes active, experiential learning. An embedded mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected through surveys (N = 286), determined using the Yamane formula with a 5% margin of error and simple random sampling, while qualitative insights were obtained via semi-structured interviews and institutional document analysis. Selected students also engaged directly with Meta Quest VR headsets to assess usability and learning outcomes. Quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVA showed that while awareness of immersive technologies is relatively high, implementation remains limited. VR-based instruction in graph theory led to significantly higher post-test scores (average = 78.7%) compared to traditional methods (average = 56.2%), reflecting enhanced engagement and conceptual understanding. Thematic analysis of qualitative data identified key barriers, including high infrastructural costs, limited technical expertise, and absence of formal institutional policies. These findings provide practical insights for strategic planning and evidence-based policy development to support the integration of immersive technologies in higher education in Zambia and the broader region.
Downloads
References
Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Alzahrani, A. I., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). Challenges and prospects of virtual reality and augmented reality utilization among primary school teachers: A developing country perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
Aini, M. A. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Ensuring equitable access to education technology. Assoeltan Indonesian Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.70610/edujavare.v3i1.800
Babalola, A., Manu, P., Cheung, C., Yunusa-Kaltungo, A., & Bartolo, P. (2023). Applications of immersive technologies for occupational safety and health training and education: A systematic review. Safety Science, 166, 106214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106214
Babu, S. K., Krishna, S., U. R., & Bhavani, R. R. (2018). Virtual reality learning environments for vocational education: A comparison study with conventional instructional media on knowledge retention. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 385–389). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00094
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Delgado, J. M. D., Oyedele, L., Demian, P., & Beach, T. (2020). A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 45, 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122
D'Elia, F., Di Tore, S., & Sibilio, M. (2012). A constructivist approach to virtual reality for experiential learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2012.9.3.317
Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., van den Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of Augmented Reality in Educational Environments-A Systematic Literature Review. Benefits, 3, 6-2015.
Elmqaddem, N. (2019). Augmented reality and virtual reality in education: Myth or reality? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers. College Press.
Hadjiliasi, A., Nisiotis, L., & Polycarpou, I. (2024, October). A comparative assessment of technology acceptance and learning outcomes in computer based versus VR based pedagogical agents. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00148
Hunaepi, H., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. R., & Fadly, W. (2023). Augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Reflection Journal, 3(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v3i2.1831
Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of Virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.
Msweli, N., & Phahlane, M. (2025). Health-related issues of immersive technologies: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 12(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020047
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
RSIS International. (2023). Framework for VR implementation in tertiary education in Zimbabwe. https://rsis.org.zw/publications/vr-implementation-framework
Samosorn, A. B., Gilbert, G. E., Bauman, E. B., Khine, J., & McGonigle, D. (2020). Teaching airway insertion skills to nursing faculty and students using virtual reality: A pilot study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 39, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.10.004
Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2020). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: A literature review. Virtual Reality, 25, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
Sümer, M., & Vaněček, D. (2024). A systematic review of virtual and augmented realities in higher education: Trends and issues. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2382854
Thomas, O., & Teuteberg, F. (Eds.). (2015). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2015). Osnabrück, Germany. Association for Information Systems (AISeL).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xue, F., Guo, R., Yao, S., Wang, L., & Ma, K.-L. (2023, April). From artifacts to outcomes: Comparison of HMD VR, desktop, and slides lectures for food microbiology laboratory instruction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580913
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 John Pamba, Ng’andu Mwiya, Calvin Silwizya, Betty Shitima Bweupe, Simon Banda, Mushikwa Chanda, Natalia Zulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
